Guest Post: LIGHTFAIR 2007-With More Fluorescent Technology, Is Our Quest for Energy Efficiency Short-Sighted?
Anna Hackman is the author and publisher of the blog Green Talk, which is based on her own experience of building and maintaining a house using many green materials, and wishing to connect with others to help turn the planet green, one conversation at a time. This post was originally published on May 9, 2007.
LightFair NYC this year was home to amazing light technology from energy efficiency featuring LED technology to the reduction of mercury content in the fluorescent bulbs. As an environmentalist, I was impressed by the advancement of technology in lighting energy efficiency but was scared at the same time that we as consumers may be short sighted in our quest for energy efficiency by ignoring the proper disposal of these bulbs.
The LED technology impressed me with its long life and lack of mercury content. In addition, Phillips and SLI lighting both featured low mercury content in their fluorescent bulbs. SLI lighting featured the most impressive environmental concern with all of their fluorescent bulbs containing low level of mercury and their bulb glass was free of lead.
During my discussion with Flemming Jensen, Vice President of Industrial/Commercial Sales at SLI Lighting about why the company was producing low mercury fluorescent bulbs and lead-free glass, he made me aware of our current disposal practices of fluorescent lighting. The world is pushing for more efficient lighting, but has not looked at the disposal of the compact fluorescent. Giants like Wal-Mart and Home Depot are offering lower-priced fluorescent bulbs to encourage consumers to save energy. It seems that no one has asked the question what about the disposal of these products after they no longer work.
In my area in New Jersey, I have to make an appointment and then drive about thirty minutes to dispose of my fluorescent bulbs at the County Municipal building, or wait twice a year to go to a designated location in my county to dispose of hazardous waste. Most consumers are not going to take the time to dispose of their bulbs correctly. It is too much of an inconvenience. They just throw them away. Fluorescent bulbs have mercury and lead in them, which is leaching into our soils and waterways from the landfills.
Although the world is taking notice that we need to stop global warming, there should be a simultaneous effort being made to require easily accessible places to dispose of the fluorescent lighting. The giants like Wal-Mart could easily exchange burnt-out fluorescent bulbs for new ones with a discount offered to encourage people to recycle.
Cities and counties could have more accessible place for people to drop off their bulbs like they drop off their newspapers and plastics. The only way for more easily accessible recycling to be achieved is for the consumers to demand it. In addition, we can demand that bulbs are made of low levels of mercury and lead free glass. We have the power in this world because we speak in the language of money. We have asked for more energy efficient technology; let’s now demand for our landfills to remain lead and mercury free.
Editor’s note: In my own browsing this weekend, I came across LampRecycle.com, which publishes a list of companies that will take back CFLs and other “spent mercury containing lamps.” LampRecycle.org is published by the National Electrical Manufacturer’s Association.
Tags: cfl, Conservation, Green Tech, Home and Garden, lightfair+2007, lighting, mercury

May 16th, 2007 at 2:36 am
see http://www.productpolicy.org/media.html
Local Government Groups Call for Manufacturers to Recycle Toxic Mercury Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs [pdf] May 8, 2007
White Paper: Manufacturer Take Back: The Next Step for Energy Efficient Lighting Products [pdf] May 8, 2007
May 16th, 2007 at 5:34 am
It is nice to see the awareness and remedies to check the global warming is coming up. More than money nature is important and efforts are well appreciated.
Your wiriting is really interesting to go through.
Hope these new nature friendly technologies spread the global market to make a revolution in the lighting world.
Jithesh
July 21st, 2007 at 9:30 pm
We need to be smart… the CFLs are going to be out, they contain mercury, saves energy… right, but have mercury… a real green product only the leds, we need to consume more leds to make they become more cheap, is the only way now…
You can check some CFLs and Incansdescent replacements with LED in http://www.mexled.com and everled (don´t remember the page), take the next step…
Fred
February 27th, 2008 at 10:46 pm
I agree with Fred^ the more we drive the LED market the more cost effective they will become. Although most people are not satisfied with the light output that most LEDs are producing and become deterred from the technology.
At http://www.elumanation.com I have found true high brightness LED products that are covered under a 2 year warranty. Elumanation’s LED products have been more then sufficient in light output compared to any other LED that I have researched.
No other LED bulb has such a bright lumen output at an equivalent wattage. It appears that LEDs are ready for the general illumination market.
I suggest embracing the bright future with direct replacement, high brightness LEDs…
http://www.elumanation.com